CRIPPS: A SELF-CONFESSED RACIST
we are not born with the sentiments that we
eventually come to hold ~
Cripps, left, who ran
the failed GLG, realised and accepted he was racist
to hate Jews ("self-confessed racist" means just
that). He preferred to call me "racist" in my
critique of Islamic doctrine (the Koran) because he
preferred to blame "the Jews and their state in
Palestine" for a conflict that was not mentioned in
my criticism of religions. Supporters of the
"Palestinian cause" call "racist" any critic of
Islam - as they did recently in Melbourne,
Australia, when they organised pro-"Palestine"
protests against a critic of Islamic doctrine.
The political left express a number of views
regarding Muslims, Palestine, Jews and Israel - and
these views are those that have been expressed by
Hitler and Nazis (al Husseini).
Robert Cripps is seeking to make a financial gain
from what is either a deliberate misreading of what
I write, or a consequence of the limitations of his
Apparently, if the reader of one's writings is
intellectually deficient, and Robert Cripps is such
a person*, then what is misunderstood by such a
reader, can be argued in court to be what is
actually meant by what is written.
Cripps posted disclaimers throughout my exhibition
of 2009, on the grounds that the content might
expose him to some legal liability. His disclaimers
stated that he disagreed with the content.
Subsequently he has claimed that this was on account
of the complexity of that content, complexity that
prevented him from understanding what was written,
therefore he feared being liable for who-knows-what.
In his sworn submission to VCAT Cripps claimed that
the liability he feared regarding content was over
the "complexity" of that content. Apparently
complexity can cause a mental or other injury? This
is not a mark of someone who anyone could describe
as intellectually competent.)
Australia's bizarre legal definitions (drawn from
High Court rulings) define readers who are limited
in the way described to be "ordinary" and
"reasonable" and dispenses with what the words
actually mean. This allows for words to mean
whatever they might be assumed to mean by those who
are intellectually deficient and allows for words to
mean what such a person presumes they might
If, in addition to their intellectual limitations,
the "ordinary" or "reasonable" reader has a limited
knowledge of history, and if such a reader holds, on
the basis of such limitations, beliefs about
history, even if such beliefs are inconsistent with
the historical facts, then any author who refers to
history can be penalised for not considering such
readers' shortcomings, or that such persons might
exist. Thus the law makes it incumbent that an
author is to suffer a penalty for failing to include
material that would correct the misconceptions such
readers have, or might have, because the author did
not use their powers of premonition to anticipate
the myriad of shortcomings in the knowledge of
history that one's readership might have. As I have
failed to use my powers of premonition (Australian
law works on the premise that I must possess such
powers), and did not write a complete history of
Nazis and Islam (etc), I can suffer penalty and
Cripps can sue to make a financial gain on the
grounds of the severe limitations of his intellect
In Australia if someone holds an idea such as the
ideas held by Robert Cripps, and if another points
out that the same ideas have been expressed by Adolf
Hitler (an historical fact), this will cause others
to think less of the person, such as Robert Cripps,
for holding such ideas. In Australia someone like
Cripps can therefore sue to protect the ideas that
they hold from being criticised, because, since they
hold such ideas, having it pointed out to another
that such ideas have already been
expressed by someone like Hitler will "defame" them.
1- Robert Cripps opposed the existence of "the Jew's
state" in "Palestine" (or "the Jews and their state
in Palestine"). This is the position of the
political left. Hitler opposed the Jews
forming a state in "Palestine".
2- Robert Cripps said that Jews are illegally in the
land of "Palestinians".
This is the position of the political left.
Hitler claimed that Jews were illegally
in the land of the Germans (Hitler made the same
claims regarding "Palestine", Russia France, etc).
3- Robert Cripps said that the Jews were the cause
This is the position of the political left.
Hitler said that the Jews were the
source of conflict.
4- Robert Cripps supported the Muslim cause in
This is the position of the political left.
Hitler supported the Muslim cause in
Palestine. (The hadith, part of the Sunna, urges
the genocide of the Jews. This is found in the Hamas
Covenant, is supported by Australia's current mufti,
and was being pursued by al Husseini, a Nazi).
Cripps acknowledged he hated Jews and admitted this
was racist. Hitler openly hated Jews.
Australia is oppressive. It is safe only if one
writes nothing at all; if one does not question
anything at all; a nation in which the only thing
encouraged is to mindlessly fuck and breed: http://www.vakras.com/kouros.html.
Robert Cripps is a self-confessed racist.
2) Robert Cripps is:
manifestation of the new-left who have adopted the
sentiments Hitler expressed in his Mein Kampf, but
who believe that, though theirs and Hitler's
sentiments are the same, their racism is a
The explanation of what the views of the political
left are, and how the left even without reading
Hitler's Mein Kampf adopt the sentiments expressed
in Mein Kampf can be found here: [new-left
which I write: "A
large number of the "conscientious" Left are (or
claim to be) oblivious to what Hitler actually
wrote, but denounce him for for what they claim
is his racism. Nevertheless, this
"conscientious" Left have adopted what Hitler
wrote in the Mein Kampf, and express these very
same sentiments as a demonstration of the
sincerity of their good conscience!"
views expressed by the left have, as a matter of
history, been expressed by Hitler in Mein Kampf. The
historical record is immutable.
I AM BEING SUED BECAUSE BY POINTING TO AN HISTORICAL
FACT I CAN CAUSE INJURY TO A PERSON WHO, THOUGH
UNAWARE THAT THE OPINIONS AND IDEAS THEY EXPRESS HAVE
ALREADY BEEN EXPRESSED BY HITLER HISTORICALLY,
THEY HOLD THESE IDEAS NEVERTHELESS. This is nothing
more than an attempt to limit thought, analysis of
thoughts, information and ideas, in other words this
is simple censorship intended to prevent the imparting
of the following information:
1) The left, like Hitler in Mein
Kampf, oppose the existence of a Jewish state in
2) the left, like Hitler/Nazis (
Nazis includes such persons as al Husseini), define
"Palestinian" to be Arab and Muslim;
3) the left, like Hitler, support the
Muslim cause against "the Jews of Palestine" (Hitler
supported al Husseini's Muslim objective of making
and the cause of Muslims is a religious
cause (hence it is a Muslim cause) which seeks to
exterminate the Jews, as that, in Islamic doctrine, is
a mandatory prerequisite for Judgement Day, or as it
is called by Muslims "Day of Resurrection". (The
Muslims, like Christians, believe in judgement day,
however, the Muslims, unlike the Christians, require
that all the Jews have to have been exterminated for
this to come about. This is a requirement made in the
hadith, for instance, Sahih Muslim, Book 41, number
6983. Another of the hadith which calls for the
genocide of the Jews is cited in the Hamas covenant as
being the objective of Muslim Palestinians.
Australia's own current Mufti visited "Palestine" -
Gaza - in December 2012 and urged Muslims vigilance
and perseverance in the quest to commit the genocide
of the Jews (http://vakras.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/genocide-incited-by-australian-muslims.html).
Therefore ANYONE who supports the "Palestinian cause"
is supporting a religious cause that has as its
objective the committing of genocide of the Jews. This
is the same objective Hitler sought for Germany and
for Palestine in WW2, and is the same objective sought
by the Nazi Muslim al Husseini.);
4) the left, like Hitler, blame Jews
for violence and ascribe to Jews the trait of being
fomenters of violence. The left, vis-a-vis "Palestine"
"the Palestine issue"), make accusations against Jews
which are made out to instead be criticism of the
state of Israel and not "the Jews". However, the
left's criticisms that are claimed to be of Israel are
of the kind that Hitler, as well as the Nazis (which
includes Arab Muslim Nazis),
made against Jews before the state of Israel ever
existed. (This point is made here: [new-left
4.1 Hitler claimed Jews were responsible for war,
including ww2 (as well as the Franco-Prussian war,
ww1, etc, Hitler speeches);
4.2 Nazis (al Husseini, a Muslim Arab Nazi) claimed
ww2 was caused by Jews (and continued to make that
claim over a decade after ww2);
4.3 The left claim that the Jews are the cause of war
(vis-a-vis) "Palestine", and so
both the Nazis and the left accuse the Jews of being
fomenters of war and conflict, warmongers:
p. 35, FACES OF THE ENEMY - reflections of the hostile imagination. The psychology of Enmity. Sam Keen. ISBN 0062504673. Even while Jews were being exterminated, the Nazis proclaimed that the Jews bore the guilt for war and were responsible for the fate that was befalling them. The Muslim Nazi al Husseini made the same pronouncement a decade after the war.
one of the many anti-Jewish Nazi propaganda posters
that can be found doing a Google search for "Nazi
propaganda posters". Jews are referred to
as “kriegsanstifter”, warmongers in German. It is a
trait ascribed to the Jews both by the Nazis
historically, and the political left such as Leunig,
below, who make similar pronouncements about Jews as
did the Nazis. The Palestinian Charter of 1968
proclaims that all peace-loving nations will wage
war against Israel to achieve peace. Although it is
Muslims who proclaim that "war brings peace", Leunig
ascribes this to the victims of the
Muslim-war-waged-for-peace, the Jews.
Article 22 of the 1968 Palestinian
Charter "war brings peace":
liberation of Palestine will destroy the Zionist and
imperialist presence and will contribute to the
establishment of peace in the Middle East, the
Palestinian people look for the support of all the
progressive and peaceful forces and urge them all,
irrespective of their affiliations and beliefs, to
offer the Palestinian people all aid and support in
their just struggle…"
the left, like Hitler, claim that Jews
(illegally) live in, and come to occupy, the land of
other peoples, or others' states (Hitler maintained
that this was the case in Germany and first sought
their expulsion, and later sought their extermination;
the left claim that Jews are in illegal occupation of
"Palestine" and seek to have the Jews expelled,
expunged or exterminated and the land "returned"
Judenfrei to the "Palestinians" on the grounds that
this is a requirement for Islam.)
Hitler supported the Muslim's doctrinal objective with
that objective being the extermination of Jews. The
contemporary left support the same Muslim objective,
HOWEVER, the left seek to prevent widespread knowledge
of Islamic doctrine and seek to suppress knowledge
that Islam seeks the genocide of Jews. By suppressing
such knowledge the left can falsely claim:
a) there is no Islamic attempt to commit the genocide
of the Jews;
b) that they therefore do not support the genocide of
the Jews by claiming that there is no evidence to show
that Islam pursues genocide, simply because they have
made such information unavailable. (That is: in the
absence of evidence, since that evidence has been
suppressed by them, the left claim that the evidence
is of the absence of evidence that such an intent
exists in Islam. This is the concept of the claim that
the absence of evidence is evidence of absence.);
this allows the left to:
c) blame Jews for defending themselves against
Muslims' religious objectives since there is no
evidence that Islam seeks genocide of the Jews. The
left then deride anyone who knows Islamic doctrine
(Koran and hadith) and who cites it as "racists".
In June (18 and 24) 2009 Robert Cripps declared me
racist because he realised that the passages quoted
from the Koran that urged violence as the only means
of achieving Islamic martyrdom would mean that Muslims
could be seen to be at fault for violence in
"Palestine", though "Palestine " was not mentioned,
and the criticism I made was of religion (which
included criticism of
Judaism, Christianity and Zoroastrianism). Cripps
preferred that these passages should remain unknown
because, as he ADMITTED (confessed), he hated Jews,
which he acknowledged was racist and wanted to blame
Jews for conflict.
The left, and the ideas expressed by the left,
MANIFEST themselves in a number of ways. The left's
ideas are MANIFESTED IN:
a) protests against Israel, or
b) by people such as Robert Cripps who simply repeat
the claims and arguments made by the left.
This does not make such a person a representation,
personification, or embodiment of the left.
Hitler expressed his society's hatred of Jews in Mein
Kampf, a hatred that pre-existed Hitler and which had
been made respectable by the pre-Nazi intelligentsia.
Hitler was a MANIFFESTATION of German antisemitism.
The left have adopted the sentiments, being the hatred
of Jews, that were expressed historically, by Hitler.
They do not need to have read Mein Kampf to do so,
they have simply adopted the sentiment of antisemitism
and it was antisemitism that was expressed by Hitelr
in Mein Kampf.
Cripps is attempting to make a profit on his being
ignorant of history and limited in intellect. His
crack legal team have, on his behalf, claimed that
what I have imputed means that I am claiming
he is a "dangerous racist", which I do not write or
suggest, and that he has "adopted the failed theories
of the National Socialists", which I also do not write
On the new left Nazis: http://www.vakras.com/new-left-and-nazism
On the left's pursuit of the Islamic cause in
Palestine (in which critics of Islam are called
On the sentiments expressed by Hitler in Mein Kampf: http://vakras.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/university-student-unions-then-and-now.html
On the Muslims sentiments (being the committing of the
genocide of the Jews): http://vakras.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/genocide-incited-by-australian-muslims.html
On the Palestinain cause being based on the Nazi
Author: Demetrios Vakras 30 November 2013
edited 9:50 AM 6 January 2014 to add the Nazi image of "the Jew bears the guilt of war".
are petitioning the Australian government to amend the
Defamation Act of 2005 to make Australian law
consistent with its international obligations.
Support our petition here:http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/the-hon-mark-dreyfus-qc-mp-amend-the-australian-defamation-act-2005