Redleg V artists

A lawsuit protecting an ideological stance [removed from directory page 16/6/2014-28/12/2014]

[16 June 2014]

Mein Kampf, Palestine and the left

Hitler was anti-Zionist. He stated that the Jews foster a false impression that a state in Palestine will satiate their ambitions. Hitler insists that a sovereign state is intended only as a base from which Jews could expand. The left are anti-Zionist and claim Jews are expansionist and colonialist.

Hitler stated that the Jews form their own state within the states of other peoples. The left claim that the Jews have done this by forming their state of Israel within "Palestine".

Hitler claimed that Jews are a parasite, who "appear" in the states of other peoples, set up their own state where they appear, and then destroy the people within whose state they have settled. The left make a similar claim in which the Jews achieve a similar outcome by the forcible expulsion of "Palestinians" from their land whereby the Jews set up their own state in the vacated land.

Popularity of Mein Kampf in “Palestine”

The similarities between the descriptions by “Palestinians” of Jewish “occupation” and how Hitler claimed Jews settle in, and “occupy”, the lands of other peoples and that the Jews then take over and subjugate those in whose land they have settled is no coincidence. These claims are made in Mein Kampf. The left, by supporting the claims made by “Palestinians”, have adopted the sentiments expressed by Hitler in Mein Kampf.

[16 June 2014]

It is a well known historical fact that “Palestine” is a Nazi cause

[16 June 2014]

Maoists make "Palestine" part of the left's political agenda

*anti-Zionism was a Maoist fringe phenomenon (p. 150)

*anti-Zionism is now respectable and held by academics and trade unions (p.151)

*Hamas calls for the genocide of Jews as part of its Islamic duty (p.151)

*Hamas (who govern Gaza and launched the rocket attacks at the end of 2008) were organised by a Maoist convert to Islam (p.152)

*Maoism became "anti-imperialist" after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (p.152)

*"Maoist" replaced with "Islamic" (p.152)

*On the grounds that Maoists oppose colonialism, Israel was reinterpreted as a "colonialist phenomenon" (p.152)

*Maoist views became Islamic views that see Israel as being a manifestation of western imperialism (p.152)

"Palestine" was made into a symbol of anti-imperialism by Maoists.

From Resurgent Antisemitism - Global Perspectives, A H Rosenfeld)

[16 June 2014]

---

Left's alignment with Islam universally known [16 June 2014]

The association of Islam with Nazis is universally known [18 June 2014]

Australian Warfies: Defamation action to protect the sentiments held by members of Australia's far-left militant trade union

Australian "warfie" unions played an active role in anti-Vietnam war protests: "Small although key unions such as the Seamen's Union and the WWF [Waterside Workers Federation][ encouraged] support [for] strike action against the war…" (M. J. Saunders, Labor History, p.66).

Non-waterside unions (non-warfies), such as Australia's largest union, the Australian Worker's Union, did not oppose military action in Vietnam, they supported it. (M. J. Saunders, Labor History, p.66).

"In 1978 one scholar noted that 'most stoppages for political purposes, now as in the past, do not involve action by very large masses of unionists but concern relatively small unions with a long established reputation for radical–not always communist–leadership… [who hold] a strategic position in the economy', a description which described the principal maritime unions precisely." (M. J. Saunders, Labor History, p.79)

M. J. Saunders, Labor History, p.81

Contemporary warfie unions (MUA) actively agitate for the cause of "Palestine". Warfie unions are anti-Israel, and anti-Jewish and support the committing of war-crimes against Jews by Hamas in Gaza for which they blame Jews for the war crimes committed against them.

Warfie solidarity with Gaza means supporting Hamas’ actions; Hamas Covenant Article 7 (the genocide-of-the-Jews hadith): "'The Day of Judgement will not come about until Moslems fight the Jews (killing the Jews), when the Jew will hide behind stones and trees. The stones and trees will say O Moslems, O Abdulla, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him. Only the Gharkad tree, (evidently a certain kind of tree) would not do that because it is one of the trees of the Jews.' (related by al-Bukhari and Moslem)."

In pursuit of the aim of a religiously driven genocide, Hamas launched a concerted rocket attack against unarmed Jewish civilians in Israel in 2008-2009. Australia's warfies, the MUA, supported Hamas' doing so and blamed Israel. Hamas' actions were declared war crimes by Human Rights Watch.

Human Rights Watch found, that as Hamas controls

1) whether or not rockets are fired at Jewish civilians;

2) and Hamas controls where they are fired from;

3) and that Hamas had a choice of where it would launch its rockets and deliberately chose densely populated civilian centres;

4) and Hamas knows its missiles cannot be guided, and that they will injure or kill civilians;

5) and as Hamas representatives have in the past declared that they deliberately aim at all Jews, on account of their simply being Jews indiscriminately;

that Hamas are knowingly targeting civilians which is a War Crime. Human Rights Watch in August 2009 condemned Hamas for their War Crimes and in their report also explained that the idea that the excuse that Hamas are attempting to correct a military disparity that exists between themselves and Israel does not justify Hamas' targeting of civilians. There is no justification under Crimes of War to target civilians for such a purpose. It is not a defence to commit War Crimes because they are committed against Jews, however, Australia's warfies believe it is legitimate to commit war-crimes if these crimes are committed against Jews.

The Human Rights Watch report can be found here: http://www.hrw.org/news/2009/08/06/gazaisrael-hamas-rocket-attacks-civilians-unlawful

Vakras blog: http://vakras.blogspot.com.au/2013/06/genocide-incited-by-australian-muslims.html

"The purpose of the laws of war is not to create parity between parties to a conflict, or to assess their violations in light of their relevant capacities, but to minimize the harm to the civilian population.  Violations of the laws of war are not measured in the number of civilian casualties, but whether each side is taking all feasible precautions to minimize civilian loss.  Using unsophisticated weapons does not justify failure to respect the laws of war, nor does an adversary’s use of sophisticated weapons provide a pass to its opponents to ignore those laws. Disparities in military capability, however measured, are irrelevant." "Under the laws of war, individuals who willfully authorize or carry out deliberate or indiscriminate attacks against civilians are committing war crimes. " http://www.hrw.org/node/84867/section/2 [22 June 2014]

Union divide: The union divide that existed with regards to the Vietnam War persists with the "Palestine" conflict

The radical left warfie unions opposed the Vietnam War, which was an ideological war waged by the USA against communists; while the Australian Worker's Union supported the US war effort. With regards to "Palestine", warfies (MUA), consistent with their leftist ideological inheritance, support “Palestinians” even in their committing of war crimes against Jews; the Australian Worker's Union opposes "Palestinians" committing such crimes:

The Green Left/Socialist Alliance support the MUA, warfies

The Socialist Alliance “claims to be the largest [socialist] group on the Australian far Left.” ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Alliance_(Australia) )

The Green Left/Socialist Alliance:

1) condemn criticism of Islam as "racist";

2) declare criticism of Islam to be “pro-Israel”;

3) declare critics of Islam to be "Zionists";

4) proclaim their position as "pro-Palestine";

5) support Muslims and Muslim causes.

The left describe war crimes committed against Jews (refer Human Rights Watch report) as "Israel's massacre of the Gazan people". Hitler claimed that Germany too was a victim of Jews even as Germany was exterminating European Jewry.

The left describe Islamic acts of piety (terrorism) as "terrorist", "extreme", and "neo-facist" outside "Palestine". However, when these same acts are undertaken against Jews, in "Palestine", which is "occupied by Israel", the left support their being undertaken.

[16 June 2014]

"PALESTINIAN": NOT A RACIAL DEFINITION

Palestine is a geographic location.

Palestine is not a race.

Anyone living in Palestine is "Palestinian" including Jews.

The left define only Muslims as Palestinians and declare that Jews have simply invaded, occupied and taken control of the land of Palestine expelling "Palestinians"; that is, Jews are declared to have illegally occupied another people's land. This "occupation" of another people's land is described in terms that anyone familiar with the Mein Kampf has encountered. According to the left the Jews of Palestine never had a right to self-determination - for the left that right is available to Muslims alone.

[16 June 2014]

When Hitler met al Husseini

Above, Adolf Hitler, the most reviled man in history with the mufti representing the most reviled religion in history, Islam.

The mufti did not write the Koran. The mufti did not write the hadith. However, the mufti acted according to both. In Islam this is “sunna”. Australia’s Islamic Council of Victoria insists that all Islamic edicts must be acted on and explains that those who follow and act on what is written in the Koran and the hadith are not “extremist” or “Islamists”, but simply “Muslims”. Al Husseini was merely a pious Muslim who acted, as any faithful Muslim would, to commit the genocide of the Jews as this is called for in the hadith. And Adolf Hitler admired the mufti for this, emulated him, and assisted him. It is this cause that is still being pursued by Muslims and which the left support.

Al Husseini, a former Ottoman soldier, had witnessed the Ottoman Empire's successful eradication of non-Muslims. Ottoman Muslims – Turks, Kurds and Arabs – eradicated 1.5 million Armenians, 1 million Greeks and 750 thousand Syriac Christians. The term "genocide" was specifically coined to describe the racial extermination of Armenians. Some months after the meeting between Hitler and al Husseini, the Wannsee Conference was convened. At Wannsee the Nazis announced their Islam-inspired "Final Solution". (Note; there is no evidence that suggests al Husseini patook in the genocides.)

[16 June 2014]

The left adopt a Nazi cause, while the right abandon it

The new/far/extreme/radical left accompany their racist hatred of Jews with a concomitant support for Islam and support for Islamic terrorism and call critics of Islam "racist". The contemporary political right make no concomitant claim; they are as anti-Muslim as they are anti-Jewish. The contemporary right have abandoned Hitler's and the Nazis support for Muslims while the left have made Hitler's and the Nazi's position their own.

[16 June 2014]

The cause in "Palestine" has its origins as a Nazi cause An incomplete bibliography Nazi Palestine - The plan for the extermination of the Jews in Palestine, Mallmann & Cüppers [Crescent and Swastika] Halbmond und Hakenkreuz Das "Dritte Reich", die Araber und Palästina, Mallmann & Cüppers Nazi Propaganda for the Arab World, Herf The myth of Hitler's Pope, Dalin Hitler's Shadow, Brietman & Goda Jihad and Jew-Hatred, Küntzel In 2007 Küntzel was to lecture on the topic of Hitler's legacy in the Middle East. Küntzel was described as "racist" and his lecture was cancelled. [22 June 2014]

 <------------Return to Directory

 Author: Demetrios Vakras --- 2014

We are petitioning the Australian government to amend the Defamation Act of 2005 to make Australian law consistent with its international obligations.

Support our petition here:http://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/the-hon-mark-dreyfus-qc-mp-amend-the-australian-defamation-act-2005